To learn a thing or two about current classical music, say
these names softly to yourself: The Group for Contemporary Music, Speculum Musicae, The
American Composers Orchestra. These organizations got famous during the past generation
for performing works by living composers. Now smile, and speak the name of the current
contender: Bang on a Can. You dont need a doctorate in musicology to understand the difference. The Group for Contemporary Music, you can imagine, would evaluate complex scores soberly, returning afterward to the silent halls of academe. Bang on a Can just likes to make noise. Or maybe thats just what they like to pretend the Group for Contemporary Music thinks they do. For a fuller picture, you had to attend their multi-part 10th anniversary celebration, which for me, at least, began with a performance at the Kitchen -- whose name you can contrast, if you like, with Carnegie Hall -- a venerable downtown performance space in New York. The performers were Bang on Cans Spit Orchestra (not your fathers New York Philharmonic), whose members wore anything they liked, from battered old jeans to a precise, neat, orthodox little black dress. The first three Spit compositions, by three younger composers,
didnt stay with me. But the fourth, John Adamss "Shaker Loops," was
anything but noisy. Its a minimalist classic, intense and shimmering, stitching
little patterns for orchestral strings into an intangible tapestry. It showed that Bang on
a Can has a heritage, and that some of it comes from the minimalists (now, like Adams and
Philip Glass, firmly established), who helped found the current classical music
counterculture 20 years ago. So how offhand could Bang on a Can be? The marathon started with yet
another classic (or maybe a mini-classic, not four minutes long), Philip Glasss
bittersweet "Modern Love Waltz." Margaret Leng-Tan played it on two toy pianos,
celebrating the release of her delectable "Art of the Toy Piano" album on the
Point Music label. In her hands, the instrument sounded like an unexpectedly serious blend
of a harpsichord and a celesta, lightened by echoes of the "prepared"piano John
Cage invented 50 years ago, with nuts and bolts rattling between the strings. As if to
show just how serious a toy could be, she followed Glass with yet another major figure in
alternative classical music, Conlon Nancarrow, whose music (originally written for player
piano) depends on rhythmic precision. But Ms. Leng-Tan wasnt just exact. She
polished Nancarrows neatly calculated shifts of tempo, making them shine with an
alert kind of joy. But as the afternoon stretched into evening, and then into night, the
programs climax came from Icebreaker, a sharp British contemporary music ensemble
making its American debut (augmented by a brass section recruited locally) with Michael
Gordons "Trance." This work, which Icebreaker has recorded on an Argo CD,
lasted nearly an hour, melding remorseless minimal repetition with the joyful surge of
underground dance music and (this is classical music, after all) echoes of
Stravinsky. It also threw in more than one surprise -- enormous blasts on a bass drum, for
instance, and a taped conclave of spiritual leaders, their voices all murmuring at once.
For me, this piece just about defined a contemporary sensibility in classical music.
People who hated it -- or seemed to flee from it, like a New York Times music critic, who
didnt even mention "Trance" in his dismissive Bang on a Can review -- have
my sympathy. But these tender souls are missing what may turn out to be masterpiece, and
in years to come may look like the anxious oldsters who, back in 1956, grimaced at the
rise of rock and roll. One last thought. Even though -- with its funding, and its Lincoln
Center sponsorship -- Bang on a Can has become an established force, David Lang told me
that he still feels like a "weirdo" in the classical music world. Above all, he
meant that Bang on a Can-style work isnt likely to be performed by major orchestras
or opera companies, and of course hes right.
Wall Street Journal June 12, 1997 |