Every field has its orthodoxy, and one of the rules in
classical music is that you dont change what the composer wrote. Oh, you can make
cuts, and you can add flights of fancy for a soloist, in certain works which, historians
tell us, were written to allow that. But you arent supposed to second-guess Mozart. You arent supposed to decide that you could have written parts of his music better than he did, and substitute your version for his -- which makes it fascinating to hear a hybrid work in which another member of the classical composers pantheon, Richard Strauss, did precisely that. The piece Strauss played with -- and which the annual Mostly Mozart
festival at Lincoln Center presented in his version -- is "Idomeneo," an opera
that isnt performed very much, though its full of astonishing music. Mozart
wrote it just before "The Abduction from the Seraglio," the earliest of his
famous operas, and maybe more than anything else in the classical repertoire it represents
a heartbreaking road not taken. No other mature Mozart opera (except the hastily written
"La Clemenza di Tito") is wholly serious, with no mixture of comedy. No other
comes as close to being structured as a single piece of music, with musical numbers
flowing into each other, rather than starting and stopping as they normally would. Some of us can accept this now; we can understand, historically, why "Idomeneo" isnt theatrical, in the way wed use the word today. But in 1930, when Strauss made his version, musical scholarship wasnt so well developed. A daring conductor wanted to revive the piece, but thought it needed help; Strauss, riding to the rescue, quite literally recomposed the score. He cut parts of it, reordered some of what remained, and replaced secco passages with his fuller and more fluent recitative, accompanied by the full orchestra. He even wrote his own finale, to replace the much more brusque ending in Mozarts original. And at Lincoln Center, the result -- despite an annoying performance -- turned out to
be much more than a curiosity. Strauss, after all, didnt only write loud, modernist
operas like "Salome" and extravagant symphonic poems like "Ein
Heldenleben." He had a delicate side as well, apparent in his opera "Ariadne auf
Naxos," his oboe concerto, and in his incidental music for Molieres "Le
bourgeois gentilhomme," which delightfully spoofs older styles. And now a word about the performance. Maybe I wish the tenor in the title role had
sounded less boyish -- Idomeneo, after all, is a king -- and that he had more strength in
his lower range, where much of his music lies. But he sang well, and in any case he and
the other singers (Angelika Kirchschlager, Olga Makarina, and Christine Brewer, nicely
chosen for the other leading roles) werent the problem. But in his hands the music had no line, no motion from place to place. It had no color, only the most routine kind of clarity, and no sense of Mozarts style. Mr. Schwarz didnt even breathe or phrase with the singers, giving them no support at all, as if to him they were just some minor element in an otherwise orchestral texture. Sometimes hed demonstrate his control by emphasizing details -- accented notes, or momentary counter-melodies, all of which seemed pointless in a performance with no tone or shape, no strong contrast between loud music and soft, and sometimes in fast passages (like the final chorus) not much rhythm. Why, I might ask, should someone with so little to offer be entrusted with a major musical event, let alone one that so clearly demands a point of view? But theres a larger issue. For years, Mostly Mozart hasnt mattered very much. People bought tickets, and that, it seemed, was all its planners cared about. The performances mostly were routine. Lately, though, Lincoln Centers programmers, Jane Moss and Hanako Yamaguchi, have revived the artistic spark that created the series in the first place. Within a week, Ive heard not just "Idomeneo," but heartwarming and deeply original performances by Emmanuel Ax (playing Chopins second concerto on a period piano, with the Orchestra of the Age of Enlightenment) and by the deeply original Latvian-born violinist Gidon Kremer, with an irrepressible ensemble of 20-something string players from the Baltic states, which he calls KREMERata BALTICA. In a festival of this emerging quality, Schwarz -- once known for running chamber orchestras in New York, but now not much respected outside Seattle, where he leads the Seattle Symphony -- wouldnt be invited to conduct. That he should be music director is, quite simply, astonishing.
Wall Street Journal, August 11, 1998 |