Many of us lead double lives, and some of us even talk about them. One person who talks is Eric Barnhill, a pianist in a class I teach at Juilliard. On his website Eric writes: "I pay the bills by working at temp agencies. Upon matriculation I will probably be that delightful oxymoron, a full-time temp." When he takes the subway home, says Eric, he thinks about his colleagues, heading home to kick back, while his ambitions for the day are just beginning. "When I spend my day doing something else, I ache to start practicing." I asked Eric if hed ever talk that way in a professional biography, the kind wed read if we went to a concert he was playing. That way he might ease his double life; hed be performing as himself. He answered that hed feel uncomfortable, unless his bio fit the music he was playing. He might write this way, he said, if he were playing Ives, since Ives also had a day job; he sold insurance. I respect this answer. These decisions, after all, are highly personal. And yet which composers lived only in their art? Mozart, we learned not long ago, wrote tunes for junky operettas. Brahms wouldnt want you to know how he made his living when he was young; he played the piano in a most disreputable bar. Tchaikovsky -- Im not making this up -- once dressed as a ballerina, and danced a pas de deux with Saint-Saens. Eric, todays great composers are riding the subway with you. This is Greg Sandow, musing on music. Visit Eric Barnhill's website! Ever wish you could quit your job, and be a great composer? Ive
got news for you -- it is a job. He lived in London then, and ran opera companies that were supposed to make money. To make them pay, he had to sell tickets. To sell tickets, he put monsters, mermaids, and fire-breathing dragons on stage, all brought to life with the best 18th-century special effects. He hired exotic Italian singers, who could not have been the well-bred early music types we hear in his operas today. These singers were flamboyant and spectacular. Their costumes set trends, or caused scandals, if they were too revealing. When two sopranos fought on stage, the press wrote obscene comments. Imagine Handel on the cover of Vanity Fair. During performances, hed sit in the orchestra, playing outrageous harpsichord. When opera stopped selling, he wrote oratorios -- with organ concertos added at intermission, so he could show off on the keyboard once more. But someone beat him to market, offering a pirate version of an oratorio hed written earlier. In those days, you couldnt sue for that. So Handel retaliated, revising the score, and offering his own production. "Esther, an oratorio by the celebrated Mr. Handel -- authorized version!" Yes, that was Handel -- composer, showman, and entrepreneur. And this is Greg Sandow, musing on music. Not long ago I was at the Met -- the museum, not the opera house. Budd,
my painter friend, got me looking at Van Goghs brushstrokes. Van Gogh was a
ferocious artist; hed paint a landscape, and attack the sky as fiercely as the rough
and rolling hills. Then I read what the museum had to say. The painting, said the blurb beside the canvas, "is cut down from a larger alterpiece. The missing upper part may have shown the Sacrificial Lamb opening the Fifth Seal." Who cares? Memo to the Met: Artistic scholarship is fine. But find yourself some poets. Have them describe the paintings. Let them, in very few words, tell us what the paintings mean to them. Post what they write. Let us react. Then post some of our reactions. Now your museum has not just respect for art, but love. This is Greg Sandow, musing about art today -- though shouldnt poets write program notes for concerts, too? |